Who was responsible in the Chandigarh PGI suicide case..

Chandigarh : The internal inquiry into the suicide incident at PGI Chandigarh has identified attendant Suraj as the primary person responsible for the victim’s distress. The report also states that female supervisor Narinder Kaur mentally pressured the deceased, creating a toxic work environment. However, other PGI staff members have been given a clean chit in the matter. The incident took place last month when a staff member working in the hospital’s support services died by suicide within the institute premises. It sparked widespread concern about workplace harassment and mental health issues in public sector institutions.

According to the inquiry report, Suraj’s behavior consistently targeted the victim and created an environment of hostility. Statements recorded during the investigation revealed that he repeatedly harassed the victim both directly and indirectly. Narinder Kaur, in her supervisory role, also reportedly used mental pressure, often scolding the victim and assigning excessive work.

The rest of the staff members were not found to be involved in any form of direct or indirect harassment, as per the findings. The PGI administration has submitted the report to Chandigarh Police for legal follow-up. Potential charges under sections related to abetment to suicide and mental harassment are being considered.

Following the incident, the victim’s family demanded accountability and better protection for contract and junior staff who may not have access to institutional support. The administration has responded by announcing a staff grievance redressal cell and plans to implement mental health support for hospital employees.

The case has reignited debates around employee rights, mental health in high-pressure government institutions, and the importance of creating safe workplaces. Legal action and internal disciplinary measures against Suraj and Narinder Kaur are expected soon. This tragic incident has prompted PGI and other similar institutions to reassess their internal policies, with many considering staff counseling and anonymous reporting mechanisms to prevent such occurrences in the future.