Chandigarh Bulldozes Illegal Shops, Traders Protest

Chandigarh : administration recently launched a crackdown on illegal shops, demolishing 25 unauthorized establishments in the city. Bulldozers were used in a swift operation targeting encroachments that had been operating without proper permissions. The action was mainly focused on certain localities, leaving many traders questioning why the crackdown was limited to specific areas like Maloya. Shop owners expressed deep anguish as their livelihood was suddenly disrupted, claiming that the demolition had taken away their means to earn daily income. Many of them said they were caught unaware and were not given sufficient notice to relocate or legalize their shops. The traders urged the authorities to implement uniform action across all areas and not restrict the demolition drive to just a few pockets. This move by the administration was part of a larger effort to clear public spaces and improve urban management by removing illegal encroachments that obstruct traffic and pose safety risks. However, the demolition has sparked protests from the affected shopkeepers who feel their concerns are being ignored. They stressed that their shops provided essential goods and services to the local population, and without alternatives or rehabilitation plans, their financial condition would worsen. The administration defended its actions by stating that encroachments had become a hindrance to city development and were illegal under municipal laws. Officials also emphasized that the drive aimed at enforcing regulations fairly and improving the overall environment for residents and visitors alike. Despite this, traders continue to seek dialogue and solutions that balance city planning needs with their economic survival. The situation highlights the ongoing challenge of urban governance where development goals and the livelihoods of small business owners must find common ground. Further discussions between authorities and traders are expected in the coming days to address grievances and work towards equitable solutions. Meanwhile, citizens have mixed reactions with some supporting the clean-up efforts and others sympathizing with the displaced shopkeepers. The administration has assured that such drives will continue but will also consider suggestions to minimize hardship for affected individuals. This episode reflects the complex dynamics of managing growing cities where legal frameworks, economic realities, and social needs intersect regularly.