Article 370 Verdict Live: ‘Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India’,

New Delhi: The five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court has started reading its decision on the petitions challenging the removal of Article 370. CJI DY Chandrachud said that the decisions of three judges are different. The debate on validity is not relevant after so many years.

The CJI said that every decision taken by the Center on behalf of the state is not subject to challenge. This will create anarchy and uncertainty and the administration of the state will come to a standstill.

The CJI said that every decision taken by the Center on behalf of the state is not subject to challenge. This will create anarchy and uncertainty and the administration of the state will come to a standstill.

The decision to remove Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir will remain intact. CJI Chandrachud, while reading the decision of the bench of five judges, said – Article 370 was temporary. It was brought for a fixed period of time. Every decision taken by the Center cannot be challenged in the court. The CJI said that only if the Centre’s decision is causing any kind of difficulty, it can be challenged.

The court said that after Article 356, it would not be correct to say that the Center can make laws only through the State Assembly. CJI also said that this decision contains the judgments of 3 judges. One decision is mine, Justice Gavai and Justice Surya Kant. The second decision is of Justice Kaul. Justice Khanna agrees with both the decisions.

Two claims regarding Mehbooba’s detention
Here, before the decision, political turmoil increased in Jammu and Kashmir. PDP alleged that their leader Mehbooba Mufti was illegally detained by the police before the verdict. After this, Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha refused to put anyone under house arrest. He termed it an attempt to spread rumours.

#Article 370, #Jammu & Kashmir, #Supreme Court, #CJI Chandrachud