SHO Faces Action for Pushing Punjab Court Guard

Punjab An incident involving an SHO (Station House Officer) in Punjab has triggered a wave of criticism and legal response after a video surfaced showing him allegedly manhandling a security guard at the district court. The footage quickly gained attention, prompting strong reactions from civil society and legal authorities alike.

The matter, which occurred earlier this week, came under judicial scrutiny as the local court took serious note of the SHO’s conduct. The court has directed the police department to register an FIR (First Information Report) against the officer involved. A formal hearing is scheduled for today, where police representatives are expected to present an update on the actions taken so far.

The altercation reportedly took place when the SHO tried to enter the courtroom without adhering to standard security protocols. When the court-appointed guard requested him to follow the correct entry procedure, things turned aggressive. Eyewitnesses stated that instead of cooperating, the SHO allegedly pushed the guard aside, sparking tension in the courtroom area.

Following the incident, legal activists and the local bar association condemned the behavior, demanding immediate suspension of the SHO. “It is unacceptable for a law enforcer to show such disregard for the rules of the court and the dignity of its staff,” said a senior advocate present at the time.

This event has reignited the discussion around police accountability and the need for better sensitization of law enforcement officers toward judicial processes and civilian interaction. While the SHO has not been officially suspended as of yet, sources within the department suggest internal disciplinary procedures are already underway.

Today’s hearing is expected to bring clarity on the legal steps being taken. The court has asked for a detailed report from the police, including whether the FIR has been filed and what immediate disciplinary actions have been considered.

Meanwhile, the Punjab Police department has released a brief statement assuring that “all individuals, regardless of their rank, are subject to the law, and due process will be followed.” However, civil rights groups are demanding that the police go beyond mere formalities and implement strict measures to prevent such misconduct in the future.

The case has sparked a broader public debate on social media, with many users voicing concern about rising instances of police high-handedness. As the judicial system continues to act as a check on such power, today’s hearing could set a precedent for future actions against officials who cross the line.

Whether this results in concrete reform or becomes yet another forgotten controversy depends largely on the transparency and speed of the actions taken by the police and judicial authorities in the days ahead.