MLA Khaira Denies Receiving Defamation Notice
Khaira claims no notice received from Punjab govt; alleged corruption in vehicle purchases led to CM’s OSD defamation warning…..
Punjab: MLA Sukhpal Singh Khaira has stated that he has not received any defamation notice sent by the government, even as controversy brews over his allegations of corruption in vehicle purchases by the state administration. Khaira had earlier accused the Punjab government of financial irregularities involving expensive cars purchased under government funds. His statements caused political tremors, especially targeting senior figures in the administration.
According to sources, a defamation notice was reportedly issued by the Office of the Chief Minister’s Officer on Special Duty (OSD), warning Khaira of legal consequences for making unverified and allegedly false accusations. However, speaking to the media recently, the senior Congress leader said, “I haven’t received any such notice. If the government truly believes I have made false claims, let them show transparency and make the relevant files public instead of intimidating me with legal threats.”
Khaira’s remarks have sparked debate in political circles. He alleged that a fleet of high-end cars was purchased without adhering to proper procurement norms. He questioned the need for luxury spending when the state is struggling with financial constraints. His tone reflected his resolve, saying that raising his voice against public money misuse is part of his duty as an elected representative.
He also mentioned that instead of responding to the questions raised, the government is choosing to silence dissent. “This is not just about me. This is about public money and accountability. Sending legal notices won’t change facts,” Khaira added.
On the other hand, government sources say that Khaira’s allegations are politically motivated and lack evidence. The OSD to the Chief Minister stated that all procurement followed transparent procedures, and the notice was sent to safeguard the government’s integrity. “We will not allow false narratives to spread unchecked,” the OSD said.
This incident marks another chapter in the ongoing tension between opposition leaders and the ruling government in Punjab. The matter could escalate if either side proceeds with legal actions. While the notice’s official receipt remains unconfirmed, the verbal exchanges have intensified the political atmosphere.
Citizens and activists have called for clarity and openness, suggesting that both parties present facts to the public. As election season approaches, such controversies are gaining prominence and shaping voter sentiment.
Whether this issue remains a war of words or reaches courtrooms, it raises a crucial question: Can whistleblowers and critics be silenced with legal warnings, or should transparency and public accountability take center stage in democratic discourse?