India Rejects UK’s Authoritarian Tag Strongly

India has strongly dismissed a British parliamentary committee’s report labeling it as an “authoritarian” state. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) responded firmly, describing the claims in the report as baseless and motivated by anti-India bias. The ministry emphasized that the report was entirely built upon unverified and questionable sources that have long shown a hostile stance towards India.

The spokesperson for the MEA, Randhir Jaiswal, addressed the matter in a press briefing, expressing deep disappointment with the tone and content of the report. He pointed out that such narratives reflect a colonial mindset and lack a genuine understanding of India’s democratic values and constitutional framework. India, he said, is the world’s largest democracy, where rights, freedoms, and institutions are deeply protected and respected.

According to Jaiswal, the allegations made in the British committee’s report do not align with the realities of modern India. The government argued that the report appears to have been influenced by biased groups that fail to represent India’s democratic institutions fairly. The MEA made it clear that India does not accept any external judgment on its democratic processes, which are determined by its people and protected by its constitution.

The strong rebuttal comes at a time when India and the UK are working towards strengthening bilateral ties, including trade and strategic cooperation. However, the MEA’s reaction highlights the importance India places on its global image, especially when it comes to democratic credentials.

This is not the first time India has pushed back against such reports from Western nations or institutions. Over the past few years, India has regularly rejected international evaluations that question its press freedom, civil liberties, or minority rights, claiming that these often rely on distorted information and politically motivated commentary.

Jaiswal also reminded the international community that India’s internal affairs are best understood by its own people and institutions. Any attempt to interfere or pass judgment without context is not only unjustified but also undiplomatic.

The UK report in question has stirred debate within political and diplomatic circles, especially since it could influence public and policy opinions abroad. However, India’s firm response seeks to clarify that its commitment to democracy remains unwavering and deeply rooted.

In the broader context, the incident underscores the challenges faced by global democracies when their political narratives are interpreted through foreign lenses. India has reiterated its belief that mutual respect and understanding should guide international relationships—not sensationalism or prejudice.